How Do I Rank?

Fill in whatever you're comfortable with — see your percentile vs. real published data. Nothing is sent anywhere; it's all calculated on this device.

Every number here cites a real public source (IRS, Census, CDC, Federal Reserve, Experian). No category is fabricated — where the data is thinner (eye color, hair loss), it's labeled "estimate" instead of "official."
Your combined rarity
Fill in 2+ categories below to see this
🦄 Unicorn status
1 in —
Based only on top-tier income/net worth/credit/homeownership and a specific clinical waist-to-height + body-fat range — not a general "thinner is better" score. This isn't body-shaming: it's scoped to a narrow, sourced definition on purpose.

Age/sex are used for categories that vary by demographic (net worth, body measurements, hair loss). State only changes results for the categories marked "by state" below.

Loading…
Why these categories and not others?

A few categories from the original idea — wingspan, bust measurement, number of siblings — were left out because no credible U.S. population dataset exists for them. This tool only shows percentiles backed by a real, cited source.

Results are framed as statistical rarity, not desirability — being far from average in either direction (very short or very tall, high or low net worth) is treated as equally "rare," not as better or worse.

The one exception is the 🦄 Unicorn badge, which is deliberately narrow: it only lights up from top-tier income/net worth/credit score, home ownership, and a specific clinical waist-to-height + body-fat range (not "thinner/smaller is always better" — outside that clinical band it doesn't apply either direction). It requires at least two of those and combined odds of 1-in-1,000+. This isn't a claim about anyone's worth as a person — it's one narrow, sourced definition, and every other category on this page stays in the neutral, no-judgment framing above.